IntegrityFlash Issue 147

01
Threat Analysis · China · GEO

SJ-29A/B conduct synchronized maneuvers

A paired Shijian-29 test system has tightened its formation in the geostationary belt to roughly 30–35 km — the closest the two have flown — while the U.S. inspector USA 324 maneuvers to keep both in view.

Author

Greg Gillinger

Collaborators & Sources

Saber Astronautics · CelesTrak · COMSPOC

Published

14 Jun 2026 · 9-min read

Since arriving in the geostationary belt in early January, Shijian-29A and -29B have held station near 73°E, drifting in and out of a loose 10–90 km formation. Over the first week of June the pair executed a coordinated set of burns that narrowed their separation to about 30–35 km and synchronized their longitudinal drift — the tightest, most deliberate formation the system has shown to dat

0255075100 2 Jun5 Jun8 Jun11 Jun14 Jun SEPARATION (km) ~35 km · 8 Jun burn pair SJ-29A / SJ-29B — pairwise separation
Fig. 1 — Pairwise separation of SJ-29A/B, 2–14 Jun 2026. Source: Saber Astronautics, CelesTrak.

Element-set histories show both objects adjusting semi-major axis within hours of one another — behavior consistent with a planned, jointly commanded maneuver rather than independent station-keeping. The timing, direction, and magnitude of the burns line up too closely to be coincidental.

Assessment

The synchronization suggests SJ-29A/B is rehearsing cooperative proximity operations. Two spacecraft holding a controlled, close formation is a prerequisite for inspection, servicing, or coordinated RPO against a third object — a capability with obvious dual-use implications.

The maneuver did not go unobserved. USA 324, a U.S. geostationary inspector, shifted longitude in the days that followed to hold a viewing geometry on the pair, settling into a position roughly one degree west.

GEO longitude band — 9 Jun 2026 68°E71°E74°E77°E SJ-29A/B · 73.3°E USA 324 Schematic — relative GEO longitudes, not to scale
Fig. 2 — Relative GEO longitudes of SJ-29A/B and USA 324 on 9 Jun. Schematic; not to scale.

Orbital parameters — SJ-29A (9 Jun 2026)

.

.

.

.

Table 1 — Observed maneuver sequence, early June 2026.
DateObjectΔa (km)Resulting sep. (km)
5 JunSJ-29B+12~70
7 JunSJ-29A−9~48
8 JunSJ-29A/Bpaired~35

Whether SJ-29A/B is working toward inspection of a partner satellite, a docking demonstration, or simply maturing the guidance needed to fly close formations, the trend line is clear: each pass tightens, and each maneuver is better coordinated than the last. The Flash will track the pair’s separation through the next station-keeping cycle.

02
Pattern-of-Life · China · GEO

TJS-11 Heading West

For the first time since settling into GEO in early March 2024, China maneuvered TJS-11 (59020). Operators raised its average altitude 58 km to generate a westward drift. From 27 May – 11 June, TJS-11’s position shifted from 120.3°E to 112.6°E — about 5,664 km. As of 15 June data, it had returned to geosynchronous altitude and appears parked at 112.6°E.

China launched TJS-11 on 23 February 2024 on an LM-5 with the extended fairing — only the second use of that configuration (the first was Yaogan-41 on 15 December 2023), and the first TJS to fly on the LM-5. The extended fairing is 18.5 m tall versus the 12.3 m standard. As usual, China released little detail, citing “multi-band, high-speed satellite communication technology verification.”

Table 1. TJS-11 maneuver timeline (SMA = semi-major axis).
DatesSMA changeDrift
27 May – 5 Jun+58 km0.45°/day west
7 Jun−30 km0.35°/day west
9–15 Jun−33 kmNo drift (parked)

For its first 26 months TJS-11 sat ~3° west of Yaogan-41. I see no notable new neighbors at its new slot; the nearest objects are Telkomsat 113BT (Indonesian COMSAT, 2024), PSN N5 (Indonesian COMSAT, 2025), Koreasat-5 (South Korean COMSAT, 2006), and Koreasat-5A (2017).

Pattern-of-life change

TJS-11 conducted its first non-station-keeping maneuvers in over two years and now sits ~33 km above GEO. After 26 months of routine east/west station keeping, a deliberate 7.7° relocation is a meaningful shift worth tracking.

LAN & SMA history
Mar 2024 – Jun 2026: steady station keeping, then a sharp SMA spike and return.
Fig. 5. TJS-11 raises SMA ~58 km, drifts west, then returns to the GEO belt at 112.6°E. (celestrak.org)
Relocation map
120.3°E (27 May) → 112.6°E (15 Jun): 7.7° / ~5,664 km west.
Fig. 6. China conducted a series of in-track maneuvers relocating TJS-11 west. (celestrak.org)
Author

Staff Analyst

Collaborators & Sources
03
Launch · China · GEO arrival

China: TJS-24 Arrives in GEO

After ~10 days in Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO), Chinese operators circularized TJS-24 (69235) and parked it in GEO at 90.3°E. With inclination near 0°, it is effectively geostationary. China placed it west of TJS-10 and east of TJS-4, with no other notable neighbors. The mission description is the now-familiar “multi-band, high-speed satellite communication technology verification” — identical to that given for TJS-10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 23 and 24.

Table 2. TJS-24 transition from GTO to geostationary. (saberastro.com & celestrak.org)
ElementLate May (GTO)5 Jun (GEO)
Inclination19.5°
Eccentricity0.730
Apogee35,858 km35,790 km
Perigee176.7 km35,783 km
How it started
Highly elliptical GTO
 
How it’s going
Circular GEO @ 90.3°E
Fig. 7. TJS-24’s transition from GTO (left) to geostationary orbit (right). (saberastro.com & celestrak.org)
Author

Staff Analyst

Collaborators & Sources
04
Launch · China

China: TJS-25 Launched

China launched an LM-5 with extended fairing carrying TJS-25 (69474) from Wenchang. Per official sources, it reached the planned orbit and “will be mainly used to carry out multi-band and high-speed communication technology validation tests.” TJS-25 will likely spend ~10 days in GTO before being circularized into its GEO slot. It carries the identical mission description used for TJS-10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 23, 24 and 25.

— TJS-25 launch (LM-5, extended fairing)
Video embed — paste URL or use /embed in Ghost

Notably, TJS-20, 23 and 25 all launched on the LM-5 with extended fairing and sport similar mission patches — suggesting related missions:

  • TJS-20 — 62.4°E, inclination 5.5°, RAAN 300°
  • TJS-23 — 175.5°E, inclination 5.6°, RAAN 297°
  • TJS-25 — if placed equidistant from TJS-20 and 23, it would land near ~119°E (confirmable in ~2 weeks) — about 1° from the slot just vacated by TJS-11.

TJS-25 first observation in GTO (11 Jun)

Eccentricity = 0.76  ·  Apogee = 45,755 km  ·  Perigee = 224.1 km

§ The Growing TJS Catalog

With TJS-25, 14 of 23 series members have publicly unknown missions.

Table 3. The TJS catalog through TJS-25. * launched on LM-5 with extended fairing. (Gunther’s Space Page, celestrak.org)
YrNameAlt nameSat #Int’l desSiteVehicleMission
2015TJS-1Qianshao-3 1408922015-046AXichangLM-3BSIGINT
2017TJS-2Huoyan-1 01419112017-001AXichangLM-3BEarly Warning
2018TJS-3438742018-110AXichangLM-3CUnknown/Mobile
2019TJS-4Qianshao-3 2446372019-070AXichangLM-3BSIGINT
2020TJS-5Huoyan-1 02449782020-002AXichangLM-3BEarly Warning
2021TJS-6Huoyan-1 03476132021-010AXichangLM-3BEarly Warning
2021TJS-7491152021-077AXichangLM-3BEarly Warning?
2021TJS-9Qianshao-3 3505742021-135AXichangLM-3BSIGINT?
2023TJS-10582042023-169AWenchangLM-7AUnknown/Mobile
2024TJS-11*590202024-037AWenchangLM-5 extUnknown
2024TJS-12Qianshao-3 4623742024-246XichangLM-3BUnknown
2024TJS-13Huoyan-1 04621882024-227XichangLM-3BEarly Warning/HEO
2025TJS-14628042025-017AXichangLM-3BUnknown
2025TJS-15King of the West631572025-045AXichangLM-3BUnknown/Mobile
2025TJS-16King of the East633972025-064AWenchangLM-7AUnknown/Mobile
2025TJS-17King of the North635242025-073AXichangLM-3BUnknown/Mobile
2025TJS-19King of the South639242025-097AXichangLM-3CUnknown
2025TJS-20*661422025-238AWenchangLM-5 extUnknown
2025TJS-21Huoyan-1 05665862025-269AXichangLM-3BEarly Warning/HEO
2025TJS-22669902025-290AXichangLM-3BUnknown
2025TJS-23*672262025-306WenchangLM-5 extUnknown
2026TJS-24692352026-116WenchangLM-7AUnknown
2026TJS-25*694742026-129WenchangLM-5 extUnknown
Relocation map
120.3°E (27 May) → 112.6°E (15 Jun): 7.7° / ~5,664 km west.
Fig. 8. LM-5 prepares to launch TJS-25 from Wenchang; the related TJS-20/23/25 mission patches. (nasaspaceflight.com)
Author

Staff Analyst

Collaborators & Sources
05
Launch · China · Megaconstellation

China Launches 4 Guowang Test Satellites

hina launched an LM-2D with four Guowang test satellites (69320–69323) from Xichang; all entered their preset orbits. The launch resembles the 1 April 2025 (HJS-6A–D) and 24 April 2026 (HJS-9A–D) missions — both LM-2D, four test satellites, 55° inclination. This group released near 450 km (similar to HJS-6, lower than HJS-9 at 505 km).

LM-2D launch of the four Guowang test satellites

Video embed — paste URL or use /embed in Ghost

The new satellites (69320–23) are inclined 55.0° with SMAs of ~449 km. On 6 June they held a 1.4° east RAAN offset from HJS-6, but SMA differences are precessing them west toward the HJS-6 plane at ~0.1°/day, so they will end up west of the HJS-6 group. By my count this brings the total to 27 Guowang test satellites on orbit.

Comparing the “low fliers”

China has launched three groups of four satellites into orbits about half the altitude of operational Guowang — all on LM-2Ds — likely testing China SatNet’s plans for an “inner shell.” Group 1 (HJS-6B–D, 63429–31; 63428 reentered 16 Oct 2025) is raising SMA ~50 km toward 501 km. Group 2 (HJS-9A–D, 68831–34) is actively maneuvering, SMAs 507–508 km, ~6° west RAAN offset from Group 1. Group 3 (69320–23) shows no maneuvers yet (not unusual); its eventual plane depends on the timing of SMA increases.

LM-2D liftoff
Ascent & banner

Fig. 9. LM-2D launch montage, four Guowang test satellites. (nasaspaceflight.com)

RAAN offsets
69320-23 vs HJS-6B–D (1.4°) and HJS-9A–D (7.4° east RAAN offset).

Fig. 10. Newest test satellites share 55° inclination with a 1.4° east RAAN offset from HJS-6, closing at ~0.1°/day. (saberastro.com)

§ Guowang Test-Launch Summary

Per Andrew Jones (SpaceNews, Apr 2021), ITU filings revealed plans for two “GW” LEO constellations totaling 12,992 satellites, spanning 500–1,145 km altitude and 30–85° inclination. China has now conducted ten test launches.

Table 3. The TJS catalog through TJS-25. * launched on LM-5 with extended fairing. (Gunther’s Space Page, celestrak.org)
#DateSatsCatalogVehicleSiteInclSMA
1*9 Jul 2023257288–89LM-2CJiuquan86.5°1,111 km
2*23 Nov 2023358425–27LM-2DXichang50.0°1,104 km
3*5 Dec 2023158505Jielong-3Yellow Sea86.5°1,111 km
4*30 Dec 2023358691–93LM-2CJiuquan50.0°1,104 km
530 Nov 2024162186LM-2CWenchang50.0°1,104 km
61 Apr 2025463428–31LM-2DJiuquan55.0°450–470 km
716 Sep 2025465617–20LM-2CJiuquan50.0°1,104 km
811 Apr 2026168687Jielong-3Yellow Sea86.5°1,004 km
924 Apr 2026468831–34LM-2DXichang55.0°~507 km
1031 May 2026469320–23LM-2DXichang55.0°~450 km
Author

Staff Analyst

Collaborators & Sources
06
Megaconstellation · China · Tempo

Barrage: China Conducts 4 Qianfan Launches in 9 Days

China ran four Qianfan (SpaceSail) launches in nine days, including the debut of the Long March-12B. Across 12 Qianfan launches to date, seven have used the LM-6A (Taiyuan), four the LM-8 (Wenchang), and one the LM-12B (Jiuquan).

— the four Qianfan launches (LM-12B, LM-6A, LM-8, ZQ-2E)

Video embed — paste URL or use /embed in Ghost

Table 5. The 9-day Qianfan barrage.

DateVehicleSitePayloadNotes
1 JunLM-12BJiuquanQianfan 163–164 (“Group 8”)LM-12B debut; no recovery test; co-planar w/ Group 5
4 JunLM-6ATaiyuan18 sats (“Group 11”)Fills the last empty plane
5 JunLM-8Wenchang18 sats (“Group 12”)Not cataloged as of 14 Jun
9 JunZQ-2EDTC-01 + China Mobile 02Test sats, 400 km / 55°; excluded from counts

The LM-12B released Qianfan 163/164 at ~1,034 km — only 35 km below the 1,069 km operational orbit and far higher than the typical ~810 km of LM-6A/LM-8 launches, shortening the climb. Group 5 had lost two of 18 to its operational altitude, and 163/164 may serve as replacements. Less encouraging: the LM-12B left its spent upper stage (69327) in a 732×1,022 km orbit that, per Dr. Darren McKnight of LEOLabs, will decay over the next “200–400 years.” The Group 11 upper stage similarly sits in a 773×631 km orbit.

New design detail (via “China in Space”)

Each Qianfan satellite is believed to weigh ~300 kg in a flat-pack design with a single solar array, stacked in two parallel columns to maximize fairing packing. Each carries an electric Hall-effect thruster burning krypton, producing 20 mN of thrust at a specific impulse of ~1,385 s.

§ Constellation Summary

All planes are inclined 89° with ~20° RAAN spacing; with Group 11, nine planes are now in use. Of 200 satellites on orbit, 87 have reached the 1,069 km operational altitude.

Table 6. Qianfan groups. (saberastro.com)

GroupCatalogVehicleLaunchedStatus
160379–60396LM-6A6 Aug 202417/18 (Qianfan 7 may be inop)
261552–61569LM-6A15 Oct 20243/18
362238–62255LM-6A5 Dec 202416/18 (39 & 42 inop); co-planar Group 10
462785–62802LM-6A23 Jan 202518/18
563159–63176LM-811 Mar 202516/18 (77 & 83 inop); co-planar Group 8
666033–66050LM-6A17 Oct 202517/18 (101 inop)
768636–68653LM-87 Apr 2026Raising (1,024–1,063 km)
869325–69326LM-12B1 Jun 20262 sats @ 1,034 km; co-planar Group 5
969073–69090LM-612 May 202617/18 raising (137 lagging; 850–880 km)
1069104–69121LM-817 May 2026Raising (825–850 km); co-planar Group 3
1169382–69399LM-6A4 Jun 2026Raising (805–807 km)
122026-125LM-85 Jun 2026Not yet cataloged (14 Jun)
Constellation geometry
200 satellites, 9 active planes, 89° inclination, ~20° RAAN spacing.

Fig. 11. Current Qianfan constellation — plane distribution. (saberastro.com)

Author
Staff Analyst
Collaborators & Sources
Saber Astronautics · nasaspaceflight.com · China in Space
07
Threat Analysis · Russia · GEO

Luch (Olymp) 2 Gets Up Close with Intelsat 39

The Joint Commercial Operations Cell (JCO) reported several <5 km closest approaches between Luch (Olymp) 2 (55841) and Intelsat 39 (44476). Luch (Olymp) 2 is a suspected Russian SIGINT satellite that roves the GEO belt, parking for months near Western communications satellites. It has loitered just east of Intelsat 39 since early March 2025, typically 10–60 km away.

Driven by Luch maneuvers, the two closed to <5 km from 2–4 June — and at 0812 UTC on 2 June, JCO reported them <1 km apart. Luch maneuvered again on 3 June and began separating ~1.5 km/day. Intelsat 39 maneuvered on 4 June (0913 UTC); by 5 June the two were ~19 km apart and separating ~4 km/day. TLE data then showed them <5 km apart again on 8 June (~0907 UTC).

Table 7. Close approaches, Luch (Olymp) 2 vs Intelsat 39, 31 May – 8 June 2026. (saberastro.com)
DateMin separationNote
2 Jun, 0812 UTC<1 kmClosest reported approach
2–4 Jun<5 kmMultiple POCAs (4, 3, 2 km)
4 Jun, 0913 UTCIntelsat 39 maneuvers
5 Jun~19 kmSeparating ~4 km/day
8 Jun, 0907 UTC<5 kmPair closes again
Why it matters

Western intelligence assesses the Luch vehicles as SIGINT “interceptors” that position within the narrow cone of uplink data beams to geostationary satellites — many of which fly older, unencrypted command links. Since 2023, Luch-2 has reportedly approached 17 European satellites. Officials judge it unlikely to jam or destroy directly, but capable of harvesting data on how such systems could be disrupted — potentially including the command links used for orbital adjustments.

For a full history of Luch activity, see Marco Langbroek’s blog; Ars Technica also published a February 2026 write-up based on a Financial Times investigation. (Editor’s note: Luch-1 (40258) is now in a graveyard orbit.) German space-command chief Maj. Gen. Michael Traut has described both vehicles as likely “doing SIGINT business.”
Layout note: the original issue quotes several paragraphs from the Ars Technica / Financial Times reporting here. In Ghost, place those sourced excerpts in styled quote cards (one short quote per source, attributed) — the paraphrased summary above carries the substance for readers who don’t click through.
FT graphic
Luch-2’s GEO maneuver history
SMA history
Luch (purple) & Intelsat 39 (red)

Fig. 12. Luch-2’s suspicious maneuvers (FT, ft.com); SMA histories, 31 May – 12 Jun (saberastro.com).

RIC frame — 2 Jun 2026
<5 km point of closest approach; absolute separation dips of 4, 3, 2, 6 km.

Fig. 13. 2 June closest approach and 31 May – 4 June absolute separation. (saberastro.com)

Author
Staff Analyst
Collaborators & Sources
JCO · Saber Astronautics · Financial Times · M. Langbroek
08
Article Review · US Space Force

Space-Based Long-Range Kill Chains

@NatSecLedger published an analysis arguing that the FY2027 US Space Force budget signals the end of the assumption that sensor and shooter share the same airspace. The piece’s thesis, in one line:

The next-generation kill chain doesn’t start with a fighter.
@NatSecLedger

The argument, in summary: the budget funds an orbital sensing-and-relay architecture that lets a target found in space be engaged by any networked shooter — aircraft, ship, or ground launcher — that never had to see it. Key budget facts cited:

A new RDT&E program element, Long-Range Kill Chains (LRKC), requests $1.39 B in FY2027, funding three projects: targeting-data relay infrastructure, support for “Golden Dome for America,” and a new-start Space-Based Interceptors effort against ICBMs and hypersonic glide vehicles.

$7.06 B in procurement to expand the Space-Based Air Moving Target Indicator (SB-AMTI) from regional to global coverage — premised on neither the E-7 nor ground radar being survivable enough as the primary sensor against a peer adversary.
21 S-band relay satellites, ~$11.5 M each, for delivery by end-2027, to move target data globally and execute long-range kill chains.
The Space Data Network now carries its own funding line, separated from LRKC — a signal the data backbone has matured from concept to infrastructure.
The takeaway

Because the sensor layer is in orbit and the data layer is proliferated, the same targeting picture can reach an F-35, a collaborative combat aircraft, a naval platform, and a ground launcher simultaneously — a chain that doesn’t begin with an aircraft and can’t be disabled by a single counterspace weapon.

Layout note: the original issue reproduces ~11 direct quotes from the @NatSecLedger article. For the published page, drop your selected pull quotes into styled quote cards (attributed, linked to the source). The summary and figures above convey the argument without reproducing the full article.
Concept art
Orbital sensor mesh & relay network.

Fig. 14. Space-based sensing and data-relay concept. (@NatSecLedger via X)

Author
Staff Analyst
Collaborators & Sources
@NatSecLedger
09
Gallery

Pics o’ the Fortnight

Reference map
China’s 4 major launch sites & their vehicles.

Fig. 15. Handy reference of China’s four major launch sites. (wikipedia.com)

Altitude decay plot
Rassvet-3 constellation: one reentry, six raising, eight maintaining.

Fig. 16. Russia’s 16 Rassvet-3 comms satellites (launched 23 Mar): one failed and reentered; others raising or making maintenance burns. (@planet4589 via X)

Vehicle comparison
Possible CZ-9 specs vs Starship, Ares V, New Glenn.

Fig. 17. Reported CZ-9 blueprint specs — body 10.6 m, fairing 15 m, 3-stage variant up to 185 m tall. (@raz_liu via X)

No comment required

Fig. 18. No comment required. (@wtfcetialpha5 via X)

Tanegashima launch

Fig. 19. Bucket-list item: viewing a Tanegashima launch. (asahi.com)

Author
Staff Analyst
Collaborators & Sources
@planet4589 · @raz_liu · @wtfcetialpha5 · asahi.com · Wikipedia
REF
Source Annex

Sources & References

Issue 147 is built entirely from open sources. Orbital assessments derive from publicly available element sets and commercial tracking; reporting and imagery are credited below.

ORBITAL DATA & TRACKING
[01]
Saber Astronautics — TRIC separation plots, proximity-operations geometry, GTO/GEO orbit overviews. saberastro.com
[02]
CelesTrak — semi-major axis, LAN, and longitude element histories (GP data). celestrak.org
[03]
COMSPOC — SJ-29A/B fly-along visualization. comspoc.com
[04]
Joint Commercial Operations (JCO) — Luch (Olymp) 2 / Intelsat 39 close-approach reporting.
CATALOGS & REFERENCE
[05]
Gunter’s Space Page — TJS series catalog. space.skyrocket.de
[06]
Wikipedia — China launch-site reference map. wikipedia.org
REPORTING & ANALYSIS
[07]
nasaspaceflight.com — launch coverage and imagery (TJS, Guowang, Qianfan). nasaspaceflight.com
[08]
SpaceNews — Andrew Jones; Guowang / GW ITU constellation filings. spacenews.com
[09]
Financial Times — “The suspicious manoeuvres of Russian satellite Luch-2.” ft.com
[10]
Ars Technica — Luch-2 signals-intelligence write-up (Feb 2026). arstechnica.com
[11]
@NatSecLedger — “Space-Based Long Range Kill Chains,” FY2027 budget analysis. x.com/NatSecLedger
[12]
Marco Langbroek — SatTrackCam blog; Luch activity history.
[13]
China in Space — Qianfan satellite design details.
IMAGERY & SOCIAL
[14]
@planet4589 — Jonathan McDowell; Passvet-3 orbital-decay plot. x.com/planet4589
[15]
@raz_liu — CZ-9 configuration specifications. x.com/raz_liu
[16]
@wtfcetialpha5 — Pic o’ the Fortnight. x.com/wtfcetialpha5
[17]
The Asahi Shimbun — Tanegashima launch photograph. asahi.com

Latest Issues